Getting Ahead of the Maintenance Curve
“Slashing die-change times from hours to just minutes made a huge impact on scheduling and lead times, and simplified our ability to manage the visual manufacturing process, continues Butler. “Also, back at that time we could never get ahead from a die-maintenance standpoint. We’d spend $15,000 or more per month repairing broken dies, and experience as many as 20 mishits or crashes each month.”
Butler and his team had installed a die-protection program at the time, but he feels they had taken it as far as they could have with their current pressThroughout 2006, Butler and his team retrofitted 10 of its highest-output coil-fed presses with the Cieco units, upgrading two presses every six weeks to avoid interfering with production. “We went through a learning curve with Cieco’s technicians,” Butler says, “and working together we identified several s to customize the controls to best-fit our needs. For example, they switched out the capacitive-type monitors on the controls with resistive monitors, to better resist the rigors of the pressroom.”
Other custom upgrades at the time (which have now become standard features on the controls) include an auto-logout feature so that if no one accesses a controller within a 5-min. timeframe, the control locks out access to prevent someone from changing any settings on the control. “And, we asked for the ability to set 250 individual passwords for access to the control,” says Butler, “rather than the standard 50 passwords.”
Butler quickly went to work taking advantage of the new-found die sensor capacity, using automation control inputs to direct all of the action in and around each press cell, including:• Pulse-spraying of lubricant;
• Operation of pick-and-place part-handling automation devices• Shaker-conveyor action.
“Most of our dies have at least five or six sensors,” he says. “Die crashes are down, to a maximum of one or two per month, a huge improvement from the double-digit monthly die crashes the firm once endures. “And now when a press stops, everything else stops as well,” says Butler. “Not so long ago we were averaging 40 man-hr./day for die maintenance; that’s now down to just 5 hr./day.”
Save a Press—Monitor TonnageThe controls’ tonnage-monitoring capabilities are in full display at Clairon Metals, too. Tracking tonnage has allowed the firm to relocate several tools to different presses to avoid impending press damage.
“It’s amazing how one relatively simple and affordable change like new press controls can change everything you do in your facility,” says Butler. “With tonnage monitoring, we’ve been able to treat any press-overload cases like corrective actions. Doing so, we’ve avoided any ram-adjustment issues and failures in areas such as tie rods and counterbalance rods. We also use the data from the monitors to take a proactive approach to scheduling preventive-maintenance activities, such as tool sharpening
The domino effect from Clairon Metal’s ongoing improvements is best illustrated by this graph of production efficiency, which has climbed from barely 50 percent in 2006 to near 80 percent today.
And the dominos keep falling… MF
See also: CIECO, Inc.
Technologies: Sensing/Electronics/IOT
Comments
Must be logged in to post a comment. Sign in or Create an Account
There are no comments posted.Industry 4.0 Applications in the Sheet Metal Forming Industr...
Eren Billur March 27, 2025