Articles
Mechanical or Servo--Selecting the Right Option for In-Die Tapping
![]() |
In-die tapping units satisfy high-volume production-stamping requirements, saving metalformers a considerable amount of production time and money by eliminating costly secondary tapping operations. |
Mechanical Tapping Units
Naturally, mechanical tapping units have evolved the most over time, as much of the tool and die/metal-stamping industry operates on mechanical equipment. The 40-yr. history of mechanical in-die tapping has fostered innovation and led to the development of numerous options, along with well-documented historical data on operational speed (strokes/min. and press-stroke requirements). Also, most die-maintenance and setup technicians, as well as press operators, are qualified to maintain mechanical tapping units.
Suppliers of mechanical tapping units design them to run at specific press strokes with a specific gear ratio for tap travel, with a well-defined maximum stroke rate. In most cases this situation suffices, as specific jobs usually are designed to run in specific presses due to press-bed length, press tonnage, etc. Should a die need to run in a secondary press with a press stroke other than what is recommended for the tapping unit, the stamper must make some accommodations. Most tapping units allow some leeway in stroke, perhaps a few inches. However, when stroke varies more than this, significant changes to the tooling will be required to enable proper operation of the tapping unit. Therefore, we recommend mechanical tapping units in applications where the stamper can run the tooling in the same press, run after run, or in multiple presses with similar press strokes.
Another key factor when deciding to use mechanical tapping units: press stroke rate. To ensure successful tapping operations, metalformers must consider the gear ratio of the tapping unit, as well as workpiece-material type and sheet thickness. While production speed is well-defined, the tapping operation rarely will limit stroke rate. For example, tapping an M6 x 1.0 thread in steel can run at a press speed to 60 strokes/min.—typically faster than many forming operations would allow. In these cases, mechanical tapping units often prove the most economical choice.Servo-Based Tapping Units
Just as servo technology has found its way into presses, feeds and transfer systems, it also has found its way into in-die tapping units. Servo technology adds a level of control not available with mechanical units. The question, though, is whether the extra level of control with servo-based units warrants the higher cost and technical expertise required.
Servo tapping units offer several advantages over mechanical. The use of servo motors in place of mechanical cam drivers enables the use of servo tapping units with any press stroke length, and in a variety of presses, provided that they include an encoder to feed information back to the control panel.

Finally, servo control allows the capture of processing data, which can support preventive-maintenance and product-quality programs. For example, the stamper can prescribe torque parameters and direct the press to shut down should torque vary outside those parameters. If torque climbs above the recommended setting, the tap likely has dulled and needs replacing. Conversely, too little torque could indicate a broken tap.
The decision to use mechanical or servo tapping units is specific to each application. In most applications, either option would be a good choice. Ultimately, a company needs to access its requirements, assess its engineering/support capabilities and justify its investment when choosing the tapping method best-suited to its plant and project requirements. MF
See also: Hutchison Tool Sales Co.
Related Enterprise Zones: Presses
Reader Comments
There are no comments posted at this time.