Share content on LinkedIn Share content on YouTube

Choice: Servomechanical or Hydraulic Press

October 31, 2024
0
Comments

Deciding between these two press types requires a thorough understanding of the abilities and limitations of both. Using a broad brush, a servomechanical press generally can cycle faster than a hydraulic one, while a hydraulic press typically can provide more power and flexibility.

Servomechanical presses provide more flexibility than traditional flywheel presses as they’re able to cope with a wider array of materials, applications and processes. Given the general appeal of flexibility, many metal formers want to know: Can a servomechanical press replace a hydraulic press? 

To answer the question, it’s important to understand the abilities and limitations of both types of presses. Using a broad brush, it’s reasonable to say that a servomechanical press generally can cycle faster than a hydraulic press, while a hydraulic press typically can provide more power and flexibility. 

Limitations of Servomechanical

Understanding available tonnage and energyServomechanical presses face the same principles that limit traditional flywheel presses. For example, although a servomechanical press can apply a pulse mode to move the slide downward progressively and incrementally, and allow for better drawing, it still has limited tonnage depending on where in the stroke the ram engages the material. Conversely, a hydraulic press provides full tonnage at any point in the stroke. The term for a mechanical press is “rating point,” which means the point above bottom dead center (BDC) at which the press provides its full rated tonnage capacity. For example, a 600-ton press with a 0.50-in. rating point does not have the full 600 tons to work with until the ram descends to within 0.50 in. from BDC. At any point higher in the stroke, available tonnage is exponentially less. The tonnage curve of a mechanical press is exponential, not linear.

Another limiting factor of a mechanical press (servo or flywheel) is working energy—the ability to drive force (tonnage) through a distance. In a flywheel mechanical press, working energy comes from the spinning flywheel. When the clutch engages, centrifugal force is released through the crankshaft to drive the slide downward. In a servo press, the working energy is stored in capacitors and released into the servo motor to drive the slide. Usually, servo presses have full working energy within the middle two-thirds of the speed range. When running very slowly or very quickly, it will lack full energy capacity. Even when operating within the full working-energy speed range, only a finite amount of working energy is available. At a certain point, a mechanical press will not be able to continue driving material and will stall. 

Hydraulic presses operate via pumps building pressure to drive the ram downward. While some press designs allow for dramatically increased speed, hydraulic presses typically cannot achieve the top-end speeds of mechanical presses. Mechanical presses can reach speeds to 2000 or more strokes/min., while hydraulic presses typically top out near 30 strokes/min.

In addition, hydraulic presses require large amounts of oil to operate compared to mechanical, and hydraulics require the use of consumable filters, cooling (air or heat exchanger), and various seals and O-rings to prevent leaking. Although hydraulic presses are simpler in their design, in that they only have a basic system of pumps, oil tank, valves and plumbing, they do require more upkeep than mechanical presses. That said, metal formers that neglect a hydraulic press will experience leaks and maybe failed pumps, but neglect a mechanical press and failure can be more serious—seized bushing, destroyed gears or compromised crankshaft. 

The Good

A Typical press Force CurveThe biggest benefit of hydraulic presses is their flexibility, making them versatile workhorses. A hydraulic press is only limited by its tonnage-capacity rating and can be designed with almost unlimited forming axes from multiple directions. That means a hydraulic press can be designed to replace multiple mechanical presses all in one machine. It also can be outfitted with heated or cooled plates to enable warm or hot forming, forging and composite forming. And, when it comes to stroke profile, a modern hydraulic press provides optimum flexibility with regards to ram position and speed, stop/start point, forward or backward motion, and even programmed pressure control.

A servomechanical press provides more flexibility than a flywheel mechanical press and can improve part quality. Often, a servo press can extend tool life via the ability to increase or decrease ram speed based on when certain tool features engage the material. Servo presses also can open the door to working with exotic and more demanding alloys. Perhaps the biggest benefit: A servo press can reduce reverse tonnage (snapthrough) when forming higher-tensile-strength materials, improving the life of a press. 

How to Choose

When choosing between a servomechanical or hydraulic press, consider these primary factors.

  1. Is it important to have high production rates (more than 30 strokes/min.)?
  2. What is the nature of your business contracts—multi-year contracts with high overall volume per annum, or shorter contracts with smaller annual volume?
  3. Will the press be dedicated to a process type, or should it be flexible to handle any work that comes along? 
  4. Do the parts require deep drawing (more than 1 to 2 in.), require holding under pressure for extended periods (more than a couple of seconds) or contain many complex features? 

A servomechanical press with a complicated slide motion will operate more slowly than a traditional flywheel-driven press but still faster than a hydraulic press. A rule of thumb: A hydraulic press can operate as fast as 2 sec./stroke, which gives a maximum output of 30 strokes/min., although it is possible to increase speed using accumulators and servo valving. 

When considering the types of business contracts a metal former typically engages in, single-contract work with dedicated processes lends itself more to a servomechanical press as servo presses can achieve higher production rates, while companies tending to work with multiple contracts and a variety of processes may be better suited to a hydraulic press.

For example, if the press may be used for various stamping and forming operations, but very small draw work, consider a servomechanical press. But if the press will be used for a variety of applications—stamping, blanking, deep drawing and coining, for example—a hydraulic press should get the call. 

How Deep is the Draw?

A hydraulic press can handle draw work equal to the length of its stroke—a hydraulic press with a 12-in. stroke can (in theory) draw 12 in., because it has full tonnage at any point in the stroke and can work as slowly as needed to allow material to flow. In reality, the limitation for drawing in a hydraulic press lies within the part’s material properties and the tool design. 

In contrast, a servomechanical press can perform only smaller draws, with constraints and consideration given to the tonnage curve, rating point and working energy available in the press, in addition to the tool and part design and material properties. A servomechanical press will never be able to draw as deeply as a hydraulic press, and likely will be limited to depths around 20% or less of the stroke length. 

Holding Force Under Pressure

One nice feature of a servomechanical press is the ability to dwell at the bottom of the stroke, useful when working with material that has a high springback rate, or when parts require curing time. In general, a servo press can hold under full pressure for a few seconds without issue, as the servo motor must resist the upward acting pressure from the part and tool by keeping the motor energized. This action depletes electricity from the press’ energy-management system (typically capacitors).

Conversely, a hydraulic press can maintain full pressure for an infinite amount of time. For example, it is common for a composite-forming process to require a 30-min. cure time as the press maintains full tonnage at the bottom of the stroke.

Part Complexity

Generally, the more complex the part the more suitable it is to use a hydraulic press—think parts with bends, contours, dimples, holes, or trim or draw features. Although a servo press can handle many of those features, the process likely would require use of multi-stage tooling when the mix of features is high. Or, the process might even require multiple presses. 

Again, this goes back to working energy and tonnage limitations within a mechanical press design. When a stamper seeks to make a part in a single step, or if the parts require preheating, a hydraulic press often can provide the best option. Tool savings are another benefit of using a hydraulic press for complex work, due to using a single tool to form all part features rather than using multiple tools. Lastly, even though a hydraulic press typically will run slower than a servomechanical press, when considering that a hydraulic press can form one complete part per stroke and result in lower costs for energy, part handling and overall operating costs, such a process often will prove more productive than using a servo press. MF

Industry-Related Terms: Alloys, Blanking, Center, Coining, Draw, Drawing, Form, Forming, Hydraulic Press, Point, Pulse Mode, Ram, Run, Stroke, Forming
View Glossary of Metalforming Terms

 

See also: Hydraulico, Inc.

Technologies: Stamping Presses

Comments

Must be logged in to post a comment.
There are no comments posted.

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Start receiving newsletters.