George Keremedjiev George Keremedjiev

One-Finger Quick Die Change (QDC)

January 1, 2010

No, it is not a typo. This column will showcase a spectacular QDC process that fully and totally achieves true QDC with one-finger control. This system was designed, developed and implemented at Marwood Metal Fabrication in Tillsonburg, Ontario, and is one of its superb sensor-based technologies that will be presented in this column. To place the one-finger QDC process within context, it is important to first understand the foundation upon which it was built. Namely, a superb corporate-wide and mistake-proofed manufacturing system. Driven into a sharp focus by Chris Wood, the company president, its manufacturing culture is never satisfied with the status quo.

Die T-89 Before
Fig. 1—Die T-89 Before
The following comments are based, in part on remarks made by Jake Fehr, sensor applications specialist at Marwood Metal Fabrication. “Fully sensored dies lead to many great and wonderful things such as presses running much closer to their maximum speeds,” says Fehr. For example, one of Marwood’s dies, known as T-89, a two-out die that used to run at 30 strokes/min. with an operator at full alert watching the formed metal cups exiting the die, is now fully sensored including the feed, part out and slug detection. It now runs well at 70 strokes/min. and there is no operator standing in front of the press with their hand hovering over the E-stop button.

In Fig. 1, taken shortly before the T-89 die was retrofitted with electronic sensors, a micro switch short-feed detection mechanism is visible at the top. The die was thoroughly analyzed and marked up as needed during brainstorming sessions between the sensor department and the toolmakers.

Thorough sensor monitoring was implemented for short feed detection, part ejection (two sensors mounted within the dual track exit ramp as seen in Fig. 2) and slug detection with stripper monitoring towers incorporating sensors. The sensor cables were carefully buried within the tooling and routed to the centralized connector box as seen in the upper left of the photograph.

Die T-89 After
Fig. 2—Die T-89 After

Die T-89 Payback:

1) The average die speed increased by 25 percent.

2) The die runs unattended without constant operator vigilance or attention.

Parallel Press Enhancements:

To maximize the running speeds of fully sensored dies, a careful study was done to assess the stopping times of the presses that were used to run the newly minted die sensor applications. It was determined that the brakes on the presses were not fast enough to halt the die at fast running speeds—even though the electronic sensors detected a problem. This was solved by augmenting the braking mechanisms with secondary brake installations that dramatically shortened their stopping times. Thus the full-sensored dies now could be run on these presses at maximum safe running speeds.

Fehr notes that, “We have done brake upgrades on five presses, and are planning to do a sixth one this holiday season. Our press number 7, a 150-ton Clearing, saw its speed increase from 60 to 75 strokes/min. after a brake upgrade. These facts and the supporting data are als tested and confirmed to be safe before the die information is passed on to production.”

Last-Minute Takeover Tandem Line Dies:

This can be a nightmare. Imagine taking over a product line with H pillar automotive parts that require several tandem presses with robotic pick and place systems and only a few days to actually produce parts to specifications, on time and at a competitive price. Now imagine having in place to receive this takeover job a tandem press line with some of the most sophisticated automated tooling changeover mechanisms that I have ever seen in my decades of global consultations and plant visits. Such a system, one fully developed and saturated with inhouse designed and implemented electronics resides at Marwood. Steve Spanjers, vice president of operations at Marwood, relates the following story:

“The dies arrived at the plant on Friday, October 16, 2009, at noon. We built the necessary support tooling and sensored the dies throughout the weekend, set up and programmed on Monday and shipped 5000 parts on Tuesday, October 20 at 9 a.m. In the first few weeks (bank included), we built 43,033 of each side while still satisfying all other existing customer orders on the tandem line. We spent $0 on the EOAT and $530 for the die sensing. We were able to get the speed of the line to 8.1 strokes/min. before Monday night at 5 p.m. Our average running speed for the line is 7.25 strokes/min. with the best at 9 strokes/min. This takeover job now runs at a consistent 8.1 strokes/min. The blank weighs almost 16 lb. and our average changeover time is 62 min. with the fastest ever at 29 min.”

Time after time I have seen forward-thinking and technology-based metalforming companies such as Marwood Metal Fabrication revisit their existing processes, and reinvent their approaches to basic metal stamping and assembly. Fully armed with the best mechatronics thinking, it took a 150-ton Komatsu press that was being used for hand-transfer operations, rethought QDC approaches and implemented them in that press. First it incorporated strong permanent magnets made by Tecnomagnete on both the upper and lower bolsters. It then took this one-second clamping/unclamping technology and incorporated it into a fully automated QDC system. These bolsters are connected to one another in a

One-finger quick die change
Fig. 3—One-Finger Quick Die Change
train-like configuration. During die changeover, the bolsters are air lifted and air shuttled into and out of the press. The entire process is activated via an inhouse, custom-designed control system activated with one-finger buttons. The average full changeover time is 90 sec., including the auto shut-height adjustment. The dies that run within this system are fully electronically sensored. To overcome the need for manual sensor cable changes, a wireless sensor interface was incorporated, eliminating the need to run sensor cabling from the bolsters to the press.

Fig. 3 shows a die within the press that had just completed its run. To the right is a die with the magnetic bolsters pre-attached and waiting to be shuttled into the press once the previous die is removed and returned to its staging position—left of the press. The system is fully automatic and requires only one finger to actuate and control. To see how this revolutionary quick-die-change process works, go to, where the process can be clearly seen and understood.

For nearly 25 yr., I have been encouraging the metalforming community to embrace electronics within its tooling and assembly processes. Nothing gives me more pleasure than to see companies such as Marwood Metal Fabrication not only excel but far and a exceed my expectations. Hats off to a truly worldclass metalforming operation! MF

Industry-Related Terms: Blank, Die, Run, Slug, Stripper
View Glossary of Metalforming Terms

Technologies: Tooling


Must be logged in to post a comment.
There are no comments posted.

Master the Quick Die Change Process Tooling

Master the Quick Die Change Process

Wednesday, February 26, 2020

Die Clamping Systems

Tuesday, October 1, 2019
QDC as Soft Automation Tooling

QDC as Soft Automation

Tuesday, October 1, 2019

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Start receiving newsletters.