The Art of Designing for Manufacturability
June 11, 2025Comments
In 2016, Rolls-Royce introduced its Vision Next 100 103EX concept car, with a massive, squared front-wheel base, half-revealed wheel covers, giant square front light, recessed aerodynamic lower door panels and sleek appearance. The massive, self-driving electric vehicle was designed to celebrate BMW’s centenary—but never to actually meet the road.
“The Rolls-Royce Vision Next 100 is said to be the first ‘purely visionary’ concept car from the brand, namely one that doesn’t preview an upcoming vehicle,” posted SlashGear, likening it to other concept vehicles that “sport designs with impossibly low rooflines that don’t leave room for humans, windshields raked back at wild angles and gun-slit side windows.”
Concept Part Drawings Show Intent
Imagine that customers’ product-concept drawings and submitted RFQs are like concept vehicles: intended to show desired outcomes, in general. Usually, the designs are submitted without a full realization of the steps needed to make them happen, how they can be produced for optimal results, without bottlenecks, or how to produce them at the desired price point.
That’s where the art of design for manufacturing (DfM) comes into play.
Manufacturability Follows Function
Renown American architect Louis Sullivan famously said, “Form follows function,” an architectural mantra adapted and magnified by his even more famous student, Frank Lloyd Wright. A focus on function often is the starting point for stamping-product redesign for improved manufacturability, says Kevin Conery, assistant engineering manager and die designer for Rockford Toolcraft. (Read Conery’s article, “Design for Manufacturing: a Win-Win in Metal Stamping,” on p. 16 of this issue.)