A Costly Road Ahead: Taxes and OSHA

September 25, 2023
0
Comments


By Omar S. Nashashibi

This fall, manufacturers should keep their eyes on both ends of Pennsylvania Ave. here in Washington, D.C.—the White House and the U.S. Congress. Manufacturers are looking to Capitol Hill for tax relief, while warily eyeing coming OSHA regulations. As a lobbyist for PMA in the nation’s capital, I watch all sides, lobby for the desired outcome and help prepare member companies for realistic scenarios. 

Among the jobs that lawmakers must complete annually, the most important is passing, by September 30th, 12 bills to fund the federal government. As of this writing, they have passed zero. Congress will spend much of the remainder of 2023 navigating the political obstacles to keep the lights on. Many expect negotiations to continue into December, with Republicans and Democrats in the Senate standing together against many of the House GOP’s proposals. 

The reason why spending negotiations matter to PMA’s tax-lobbying efforts: Any resolution on the requirement to amortize and capitalize Research and Development activities will need a pathway to becoming law. Few bills and provisions pass both the House and Senate on their own; rather, lawmakers attach their priorities to legislation that must pass—in this case, the government spending bills.

As part of the 2017 tax law, the ability to fully expense R&D activities disappeared on January 1, 2022, replaced with the requirement to capitalize and amortize R&D over 5 yr. Despite the appearance, R&D was, and remains, one the few bipartisan tax issues in Washington, D.C. 

At the time, Congress estimated that including the 5-yr. amortization trigger would generate $119.7 million in federal revenue and help reduce the cost of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. More importantly, when Congressional Republicans drafted the R&D provision, they assumed that a future Congress would step in and reverse the law prior to it taking effect in January 2022. Unfortunately for manufacturers, lawmakers’ hopes have yet to materialize, leading PMA to lobby for relief to manufacturers.

Last December, lawmakers came close to agreeing on a fix for the R&D challenge, but talks fell apart due to an unrelated tax issue that remains a sticking point. This summer the House tax-writing committee passed a GOP-drafted bill to reinstate the ability to fully expense R&D activities and eliminate the requirement to capitalize and amortize a company’s R&D. PMA lobbied not only to include an R&D fix in the bill, but make it retroactive to January 1, 2022, fully reversing the provision. 

The pending tax legislation also raises full expensing under bonus depreciation back to 100 percent from the current 80-percent rate, and restores the EBITDA standard under 163(j) for the deduction of interest on business loans. PMA members report that they spent on average $950,000 in 2022 on heavy equipment and machinery. If Congress does not raise Bonus Depreciation back to 100 percent, on January 1, 2024, the law will lower the rate to 60 percent, reducing a company’s purchasing power. 

PMA is lobbying to prevent these tax increases from taking effect, and to reversing those currently in place, but manufacturers likely will have to wait until December for resolution. As you read this, negotiators in the House and Senate are discussing the fate of R&D, bonus depreciation and other key tax provisions. However, that fate is tied to the government spending bills, which brings us full circle back to a vehicle for the tax provisions. 

Bottom line: There are many moving parts on which millions of dollars in manufacturing investment rely. And remember, these discussions do not even include extending the 199a deduction for passthroughs that expires December 31, 2025—a major priority for PMA.

If uncertainty from the congressional side of Pennsylvania Ave. is not enough, less than a mile away the Department of Labor is putting together a proposed rule to impose requirements on employers when the heat index exceeds 80 F, regardless of geographic location or time of year. On August 25th, OSHA formed a panel to review the impact of such a rule on small businesses. The heat rule would require employers to maintain a Heat Injury Illness Prevention Plan and train employees on the hazard of heat in the workplace. The proposed options to protect employees include mandatory 15-min. rest breaks every 2 hr., access to a cooling station or air-conditioned room that provides cold water, fans at workstations, new-employee acclimatization policies with reduced hours, temperature monitoring and reporting, and observation of workers for symptoms of heat stress.

By October 25, 2023, the small-business review panel must submit to OSHA a report on the expected impact of the rule on employers. Since word first came out in 2021 that the Biden administration was considering such an action, PMA has been alerting its members and working with policymakers about the challenges such a mandate would create for small businesses. The rule, which may take effect as early as next summer, could require that manufacturers dedicate an employee to recording the temperature in different parts of the plant throughout the day; observe employees at their workstations; and ensure that workers take proper breaks at least every 2 hr. Some of the engineering controls under consideration could cost metal formers hundreds of thousands of dollars to install and operate. 

The challenges from Washington, D.C., facing metal formers are real and will not disappear. All manufacturers should keep a close eye on what the federal government has in store. If you’re not looking, it could cost you.

Industry-Related Terms: Case, Circle, Point
View Glossary of Metalforming Terms

Technologies: Management

Comments

Must be logged in to post a comment.
There are no comments posted.

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Start receiving newsletters.