“For the past decade it has been common to see four or five C-frame presses in Japanese and Korean plants in the United States lined up in a row with a transfer passing parts between them. Great Lakes Metal Stamping took this idea to the next level, to minimize its overall project cost and be much more flexible than had they invested in a large transfer press. With the two transfers and shuttle, they can run the line as a nine-press transfer or any combination less than nine. It can run as two separate transfers (five-press and four-press) or as a five-press transfer with four hand-fed presses.”
Top: The walking-beam transfer line makes these three brake-booster stampings—front and rear covers, and a diaphragm plate (bottom left). Twenty percent of the front-cover stampings are for turbo engines, and require GLMS to add a weld nut and welded tube to the part (right).
Bottom: At the end of the line, press operator Kristi Pruitt and plant engineer Ben Jones visually inspect stamped parts for burrs and blemishes.
Complete transfer-line control rests on the shoulders of a Siemens control; cam switches on each press control trigger on-off pulses of lubrication nozzles plumbed sporadically throughout the line, depending on the die arrangement. Each press boasts a Wintriss tonnage monitor. Sensors on the transfer mechanisms look for verification of part presence and vacuum pressure; light curtains guard the front side of the complete 105-ft.-long line.
A Truly Globally Sourced Project
The press line runs at 16 strokes/min. to supply Mando with 10,000 of each of the three stamped parts weekly. That has GLMS changing out the line every 1.5 days, “a 90-min. process that includes changing out the Monobar transfer racks (equipped with vacuum-cup grippers),” explains GLMS general manager Joe Sikes, “and changing out the dies.” Die store on nearby racks and move quickly onto and off the presses via rollers and locating pins on the bolsters.
Asked if automating the brake-booster job posed any unique challenges, project manager and plant engineer Ben Jones noted a little tweaking required to take the job from an initial run rate of 8 strokes/min. up to the specified run rate. Jones managed the project from its inception, over a 20-week period.
“Ordering the presses from Taiwan (Seyi, with U.S. operations in Tullahoma, TN), the automation from Sweden (AP&T, with U.S. headquarters in Monroe, NC) and the tooling from China,” says Jones, “challenged us to get everyone on the same page, and share specs. In particular, we weren’t able to provide detailed drawings or specs for the transfer equipment to our tooling source. That required us to make some adjustments to the tools to allow the transfer system to properly locate the stampings as they go to pick them up and move them station to station.“We also, over time, have optimized the transfer-motion profile,” continues Jones, “which initially was square and eventually became smoother—more sinusoidal. This allows the transfer system to run faster, only slowing to pick up and place parts. There also is a ‘safe zone’ that allows each transfer mechanism to start its moves in and out of the press as the press cycles down and up, rather than waiting for the ram to reach top-dead center.” MF
View Glossary of Metalforming Terms
Technologies: Stamping Presses
Fagor Arrasate Filling Order for Huge Transfer Press
Friday, March 13, 2020