Brad Kuvin Brad Kuvin
Editorial Director

Collaborate, or Go It Alone?

February 25, 2021

Collaborate, or go it alone—we all face this decision daily if not hourly as issues on the job arise. While you’d think the first impulse would be to reach out for help, as I was recently reminded that’s not always the case.

The conversation in question was with Michael Davenport, executive director of the Auto/Steel Partnership (A/SP). In the role for about a year now, Davenport’s background includes time spent working in the trenches at steel companies and at automotive OEMs—a perfect fit for his A/SP role. My talk with Davenport focused on the continued development of new automotive steels, in particular Gen 3 grades, and the resources available to help metal stampers handle them—should they opt to reach out for help. The article based on my talk with Davenport will appear in MetalForming’s April issue.

But I did want to share one idea that Davenport mentioned when we spoke. When I asked how stampers should approach tooling-related issues regarding forming new steels—die friction, springback, etc.—his best advice: “Don’t go it alone. All of the steel mills have researchers working in this area, and with experience in stamping and die development. Collaborate with your material suppliers and get them involved early.”

Seems logical, right? Collaborate to find optimum solutions and do so early to avoid costly mistakes. But according to Davenport, too often stampers try to go it alone. Davenport described his frequent visits to steel mills, when he worked at an automotive OEM, to collaborate on die-design reviews and review formability simulations. In some cases, the mill even sent their engineers to witness initial die tryouts.  

Of course, collaboration doesn’t only make sense up and down the supply chain. It’s a critical success factor inside your own walls. And, collaboration becomes even more important as individuals’ skill sets grow increasingly specialized. Metal formers would be wise to leverage the unique expertise and skills of employees across multiple disciplines—production, toolroom, purchasing, quality, etc.  

Don’t use collaboration as a last resort; bake it into your culture. Author Corey Moseley, an expert in company culture and employee engagement, notes in a recent blog post that interdisciplinary collaboration also will help break down walls and tighten up connections between departments.

“Collaborating with team members or even different teams should be thought of as a learning experience,” he writes. “It’s the first step towards building a workplace culture centered around learning and development.” Moseley adds that making connections between teams and departments builds trust and boosts morale.

All of that said, there are times when working independently brings advantages, allowing us to singularly focus on a project without the distractions that collaboration can bring. According to a 2018 Stanford University study, intermittent collaboration might be the best recipe. The study reveals that when high and low performers constantly interact, the low performers often will copy the solutions brought forth by the high performers. However, when interaction between high and low performers is intermittent, ideas brought to the table by low performers contributed to the ability of high performers to achieve even better solutions. 

Bottom line: While allowing employees to work solo on some projects, provide them opportunities to collaborate and benefit from new, divergent ideas.

Industry-Related Terms: Die, Forming
View Glossary of Metalforming Terms

Technologies: Management


Must be logged in to post a comment.
There are no comments posted.

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Start receiving newsletters.