Irv Blackman Irv Blackman
Independent Financialservices Professsional

Use the Tax Law to Boost Annual Income and Create Wealth

July 1, 2012

For most readers, anxiety revolves around taxes—income and estate. Can you guess what’s in second place? Hands down, it’s achieving these three goals: increasing income on invested assets; hanging onto invested capital; and identifying alternatives to investing in the stock market.

Each concern contains a common denominator: invested assets, primarily funds in some sort of qualified plan. The struggle is als the same: How to invest the funds. Historically low interest rates, the struggling economy and the uncertainty of Wall Street have created a current investment problem that seems to have no known solution.

Enter the tax law and tax-advantaged investments. The strategies presented here work whether you are a little guy just trying to maintain your lifestyle or have millions to invest.

For tax purposes, there are two types of investment funds: qualified (such as an IRA, subject to double taxes—income and estate); and nonqualified funds, for which you paid income tax when you earned it, or received the funds by gift or inheritance. Such funds can only be subject to an estate tax, when you die.

Here are the two strategies we use most often in our tax practice.

Income-Booster Strategy (IBS)

Larry, in a 25-percent tax bracket, is 70 yr. old and retired. Joe, on the other hand, is a well-to-do business owner, also 70, and intends to keep working forever. Let’s compare their balance sheets, assuming Larry has invested $250,000 in an income contract, and Joe has invested $2.5 million.

Annual earnings from the income contract are used to pay income tax and to pay the premium on a life-insurance policy to replace the amount invested, with the balance used as spendable income. Before starting their IBS, both were earning only 2 percent on their nonqualified funds.

The numbers speak for themselves: more spendable income and more to the family.

Qualified Retirement Plan Rescue (RPR)

The cast of characters are identical, but this time the funds are in a qualified plan—a rollover IRA earning 2 percent. The IRA funds are used to buy the income contract, a tax-free transaction at its inception. However, each annual payment when received by Larry and Joe is subject to the full income-tax rate, the same as if a distribution had been made by the IRA.

Larry locked in $250,000 for his family via the life insurance, and will enjoy an annual income of $10,150 for life (4.06 percent after tax on the $250,000). Joe, because he does not need the income, elected to invest all of his after-tax income to purchase life insurance for the extraordinary face amount of $4,642,800—100-percent tax-free. (Note: If Joe had been married, he could have bought second-to-die life insurance with an additional death benefit of about $1.5 million for the same premium cost.)

How much would Joe’s family have received if he got hit by the proverbial bus without doing an RPR? Only about $750,000, because of the double tax—income and estate—on qualified plan money. So the RPR strategy turned $750,000 of after-tax money into $4,642,800 (tax-free) for Joe’s family.

I have made arrangements for readers of this column to get all of the information needed to prepare an IBS or RPR. Simply fax your name and birthday (same for your spouse if married), address and phone numbers to Irv Blackman: 847/674-5299. Or, e-mail the info to Mark “IBS” or “RPR” (or both) at the top of the page. MF
Industry-Related Terms: E-Mail
View Glossary of Metalforming Terms

Technologies: Management


Must be logged in to post a comment.
There are no comments posted.

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Start receiving newsletters.