Page 18 - MetalForming September 2011
P. 18

  The Business of Metalforming
By Michael Bleau
Debunking Reality: The Value of a Gut Check
  AutoTrader.com Question Posed
Dealer: Approximately what percentage of customers who visit your dealership to look for a vehicle initially contacted you by...?
Walk-in Shopper: While shopping for a vehicle, how did you initially establish contact with this dealership?
  E-mail 17%
Dealer
Phone Call 42%
Walk-in 41%
E-mail 2%
Phone Call 17%
Consumer
Walk-in 80%
Source: AutoTrader.com Primary Research
 Recently I met with an automotive-aftermarket service company, a rather large business with thousands of North American locations. I’m told that the near simul- taneous closing of 2000 automotive dealerships and the recession—where penny-pinching drivers have held onto their vehicles longer—had a dramatic effect on this business segment. Nearly $7 billion in business opportunities have been shifted away from dealership parts and service bays to be grabbed up by independent parts and service aftermarket companies. These companies were challenged to quickly capitalize on this tremendous opportunity. Simply opening new franchise locations and throwing more workers into the fray could result in a revenue spike. However, considering the investment required, these aftermarket-service companies had to determine whether the initial revenue load could be sustained, and whether the deluge of new, first-time cus- tomers could be converted into loyal repeat customers.
Given the sophistication of state-of-the-art database- management software, differentiating new from existing cus- tomers, and how various advertising activities impact new- customer acquisition should be a relatively simple task. But technology only goes so far; how well a company measures this has more to do with the business process surrounding how consistently your employees introduce customers into the database at the point of sale. The core issue becomes train- ing—not just transferring knowledge, but also providing sup- portive reasoning that helps employees understand how their actions impact the business’s overall performance.
Here’s a simple example. We’ve all been asked for our phone number or zip code by various retail establishments. This data helps marketers identify potential locations for new stores. When customers decline to share this information, in some cases the cashier will enter the zip code for the store— a seemingly harmless data entry but one that over time can seriously skew the data from which key management deci- sions are made. This is why intuition can sometimes lead us down less-productive paths, and why it’s important to quan- tify gut feelings, gain factual insights and use this knowledge
Michael Bleau has served manufacturing and con- sumer-related industries since 1986. Prior to forming Industry Scope, a strategic b2b and b2c sales and marketing consultancy, in 2002, he held executive positions for several automation and press manufac- turers. Michael regularly consults with manufacturing companies on strategic planning, sales and market- ing, brand and product development, PR and sales- channel development.
Industry Scope
tel. 810/397-1429 mbleau@industry-scope.com www.industry-scope.com
to better inform the organization.
Back to the automotive-parts and service aftermarket
company previously mentioned. Its executive marketing and advertising team was convinced that store managers were not performing certain required tasks. It seems that a few sour experiences throughout the company’s thousands of stores had created a myth within the management team, which believed that its barriers to success were immovable.
Herein lies a challenge for business leaders: We must per- form gut checks and continuously challenge our beliefs, to either confirm commonly held views or to debunk myth. In the July issue of Quirk’s, an article titled How AutoTrader.com Uses Primary Research to Clarify the Car-shopping Process, we learn the value of gut checks. The article summarizes the disparity between dealers’ perceptions and their consumers’ actual behavior (see the accompanying graphic above). A con- trast between the dealer’s gut feeling of consumer behavior and the consumer’s actual behavior is highlighted using a simple consumer-intercept study. Consider how different a dealer’s approach to prioritizing first-contact interactions and advertising spending would be, given the stark contrast between perceptions and consumer-behavior reality.
How different would the plight be of the executive team from the automotive-aftermarket service company if it chal- lenged its gut feelings and identified similar disparity?
Intuition and gut instinct are not only valuable, but their value rises as we gain experience. I support the occasional challenge to confirm that perception is reality, especially when the commonly held belief may be limited in scope and root- ed in outdated points of reference. Conducting simple exper- iments that challenge long-held beliefs can debunk myths and form a foundation for paradigm shifts that can lead to better decision making and improved performance. MF
  16 MetalForming/September 2011
www.metalformingmagazine.com






































































   16   17   18   19   20