Page 36 - MetalForming-May-2018-issue

Fabrication: Software
quickly. However, when fabricators want to move beyond cutting a few parts and into managing business in the most profitable and efficient way, then it’s time to consider an advanced package.
What should one look for in a sophisticated nesting program?
The answer depends on the needs of the fabricator. We find that as newer and smaller shops grow, they first need to add the capability to import parts from a variety of CAD systems, nest those parts in a very efficient way and then machine them with an optimized tool-pathing algorithm. Advanced importing, nesting and NC usually are the basic requirements. Beyond that, most shops want to take projects from quote to delivery by managing inventory and work orders, controlling remnants, and reducing waste. Advanced systems able to accomplish all of this will quickly pay for themselves.
Can you cite examples where nest- ing helped achieve significant ROI?
We recently completed a project where our nesting improvements saved an entire sheet over a production run. That was due to an approximate 3-per- cent improvement in nesting efficiency. That may not sound like a lot, but since the fabricator had runs of more than 25 sheets, it reached the end of the job using one less sheet. This not only saved material, but also handling time, worker hours and machine wear, and improved machine uptime.
ROI also results from situations where material utilization is not the main goal. For example, recently, a fab- ricator had more orders than it could cut and no room to add another machine. Therefore, it needed to reduce the time needed to cut each nest. Through a combination of nesting and motion optimization, advanced soft- ware helped the user reduce machine time by more than 10 percent for each job. Since it was running seven machines, 24 hr./day, the fabricator suddenly fulfilled production demand without purchasing additional
machines or needing to add to its workweek.
A 10-percent run-time improve- ment is significant. Is that the norm? Don’t always expect a 10-percent run-time improvement. Certainly, we want to cut more material faster, but more importantly, we seek a compre- hensive solution that allows the busi- ness to maximize ROI based on a vari-
ety of factors.
For example, a company that cuts
3 to 6-in.-thick stainless steel with its waterjet machine wanted to set up a run at the end of each day and let the machine process it overnight. To min- imize the chance of tip-up for these types of lights-out tasks, the company uses a part-avoidance feature. While this safety feature adds a few minutes to the multi-hour run, it allows for the cutting of a plate every night, which ramps up ROI.
What are the biggest nesting chal- lenges fabricators face today?
Challenges include the high cost of machines and difficulty in finding employees to program and run increas- ingly complex machines and shop processes. Software that helps keep machines running continuously and bet- ter tools for programmers can help with those challenges. Improved automation control through sheet loading, part pick- ing and scrap processing makes it easier to run these advanced features from a software “command central.”
One approach for dealing with these challenges requires importing assem- blies and creating multimachine process plans. Fabricators increasingly are concerned with more than drawing and cutting parts. They need a solution that also deals with the assembly of parts cut on various machines, includ- ing tube lasers, press brakes and plas- ma cutters. It then can unfold sheet- metal parts, task and nest for each different type of machine—all while managing the flow of different kinds of parts along the shop floor.
Bevel cutting can be challenging. How can software address this?
Bevel cutting involves complicated
processes and careful thought, making it essential to understand the cutting machine first and then the bevel pathing before parts are nested. Bevel nesting must consider bevel pathing, which adds a layer of complexity. Soft- ware coming online applies a toolpath to bevel edges. That should be available in the coming months.
How are software companies able to capture and translate customer requirements into software features and how are these enhancements prioritized?
SigmaTek, for example, uses collab- orative methodology for software development, which includes input and ideas from software users. Case in point: When a part has a small hole in it, a fiber laser can cut out the material and drop it through the slats. However, we started receiving calls from cus- tomers wanting a way to automatically cut a larger drop (one too big to fall through the slats) into small pieces that would fall through. In response, we added a laser-destruct feature to do precisely that.
Another example relates to tabbing parts into a sheet. Customers told us that they needed an automatic method for tabbing in parts that are small enough to fall through the slats of their machines while leaving tabs off of parts that would not fall through. Therefore, we created center-of-gravity tabbing to provide automatic tabbing of parts that do not have slats on both sides of the center of gravity.
Where do you see the industry as a whole five years down the road?
Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things get a lot of press. Instead of the fabrication industry using complete packages, components of new tech- nologies incorporated into workflows will improve processes, efficiencies and quality. I look for more companies to take advantage of process-monitoring and machine-utilization studies, and to recognize automation, just-in-time nesting and tool-pathing as powerful ways to get more return from invest- ments already made. MF
34 MetalForming/May 2018
www.metalformingmagazine.com