Page 29 - MetalForming February 2010
P. 29

Doug Ehlke, a national board- certified civil trial lawyer, has for more than 20 years represented metalforming companies in OSHA litigation and in labor- union elections. His law practice emphasizes labor law, personal injury, product liability, probate, estate planning and environ- mental and employment discrimination law.
Ehlke Law Offices
28840 11th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-3705 Phone: 253/839-5555
Fax: 253/874-5475
E-mail: dehlke@ehlkelawoffices.com
We all love lists. So here, in no par- ticular order, is a list of lessons learned from cases or legal devel- opments of this past decade.
1) Any alternative safeguarding method to lockout-tagout (LO/TO) must provide equivalent energy isola- tion. OSHA’s own LO/TO inspection manual and directive recognizes equiv- alent machine guarding alternatives to LO/TO during diesetting, but all poten- tial energy sources need to be effective- ly controlled by the LOTO alternative protection. Multiple, redundant safe- guarding alternatives have been accept- ed by OSHA. Be prepared to prove it.
2) Fatality or serious injury work- place-accident investigations shout out for immediate involvement of legal counsel. OSHA, union and worker-fam- ily-retained lawyers surface early at many accident scenes. Initial interviews of coworkers, supervisors and man- agers can result in slanted, erroneous misimpressions with six-figure pro- posed penalties and even higher civil lawsuits. OSHA regularly uses recorded interviews, videotaped machine inves- tigations and multiple subpoenas for employer documents and historical safety consultant audits.
3) Employers need to reevaluate workplace policies as a result of the passage of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act and the new Americans with Dis- abilities Act Amendments Act (ADAAA). Compensation studies can help avoid unfair pay disparities to protected minorities. Under the ADAAA, in dis- ability-claim cases the main inquiry is no longer whether an applicant or employer is considered disabled, but what the employer must do to accom- modate a disability. This could lead to challenges to a company’s rigid return-
to-work policy, say within 30 days after taking leave, by workers out on multi- month personal or medical leaves. Job descriptions may need to be similarly revised. And, the EEOC is receiving a major surge in claims in this layoff economy.
4) Mass layoffs require comprehen- sive planning, legal evaluating and doc- umentation of selection criteria and disclosure. The WARN law, ERISA pro- tections and EEO statues interact and impact layoff decisions. Class actions abound.
5) No employer is too small to lack basic employment policies. Reality check: Even if you’re a small employer, use temp agency workers or outsource the H.R. function. Being too busy or too poor to take the time and spend the money to develop proper employment poli- cies about harassment, discrimination, workplace complaints, holidays, leaves of absence, expectations of behavior at work creates more work and expenses in the end—things happen and disputes develop. This mistake snowballs when the first employee problem surfaces and there is no handbook procedure or structural rules within which to address it. It won’t improve by itself. It won’t just go away. It is one of the fastest growing areas of employment law.
6) Keep your sales, order-entry and payment-terms documents up to date. Cash is still king. Sales, collections and tooling ownership issues rise in these difficult economic times. The “battle-of- the-sales-forms” still requires the “magic language” clauses to provide maximum legal protection in the event of growing disputes. Attorneys’ fee clauses should be included for collection leverage.
Keep this list in mind as we head into this new decade. MF
www.metalformingmagazine.com
METALFORMING / FEBRUARY 2010 27
Metalformers’ End-of-the-Decade Checklist
 YOU & THE LAW DOUGLAS B.M. EHLKE
 
















































































   27   28   29   30   31