Page 37 - MetalForming December 2009
P. 37

 skill or course of work for the employ- er. Courts will scrutinize the objective of an employer seeking to enforce a restric- tive covenant and reject attempts to sti- fle ordinary competition, retain or pun- ish an employee. Arthur Murray case in Ohio, 150 N.E.2d at 700-01.
An employer does not normally have a proprietary interest in its at-will employees or in their skills. Post-employ- ment action by one employee to solicit other employees is actionable only when it is done for a wrongful purpose, such as to destroy the business, to misappropriate the employer’s trade secrets or to induce breach of a covenant not to compete. Schmersahl, Treloar & Co, v. McHugh, 28 S.W.3d 345 (Mo. App. 2000).
What do you do when there is a vio- lation? File a lawsuit against the former employee. Seek a temporary restraining order against the former employee. If
successful, move on to a preliminary injunction. If successful, seek a perma- nent injunction. Immediate court action is necessary to protect your rights.
What will the courts do to help? The court has wide discretion, and could do any of the following: Temporarily or permanently enforce the covenant in part or in full; rewrite the covenant, changing certain terms; or reject the covenant. The court action will vary on the fact pattern, jurisdiction and the judge you happen to get.
What prelitigation steps are helpful for employers? Before deciding to liti- gate, an employer should carefully review the noncompetition agreement and any remedy clauses and determine whether 1) the former employee is engaging in conduct prohibited by the agreement; 2) the agreement is legally enforceable; and 3) legitimate pro-
tectable interests are actually threat- ened by the former employee (or new employer’s) alleged conduct.
Prior to the exit of an employee, the employer should attempt to gather information and communicate expec- tations to the outgoing employee. This can be accomplished with a standard exit interview.
• Conduct an exit interview to gath- er information about why the employ- ee is leaving, where he is going and what he will be doing. Identify, inven- tory and secure all confidential and proprietary information.
• Provide the outgoing employee with a copy of any executed noncom- petition and confidentiality agreement.
• Provide the new employer with a copy of any relevant contracts.
• Use IT to investigate suspected computer activity. MF
   “Can I get 500 copies of that article?”
Have you been wanting extra copies of an article published in MetalForming for your own promotional efforts— trade shows, meetings, mailings, etc?
Reprints are cost effective and will produce a high-quality piece of literature for your particular needs.
We do all the work, and you’ll have your reprints in three weeks—all at a surprisingly low cost!
             Call Sue Cubranich at 216-901-8800/scubranich@pma.org for full details.
 Pocket die protection, pocket the savings.
  One of the most effective ways to improve efficiencies
in a metal stamping facility is to
implement a modern
die protection program. An easy-to-understand guide on modern die protection is essential to all stamping facilities.
By reducing or
eliminating the expenses
of die shop repair, a
successful die protection program can help a
company control its costs
and redirect die-repair dollars toward improving manufacturing processes.
Buy a set
of five, and receive the sixth guide free!
 Order your copies of “Basic Die
Protection” today!
PMA member price – $34.95 Nonmember price – $44.95
To order contact Marianne at 216-901-8800, e-mail msichi@pma.org or online at www.pma.org click on online store.
                       www.metalformingmagazine.com
METALFORMING / DECEMBER 2009 ONLINE 35































































   35   36   37   38   39