“The only real difference between the two vents is a slight height variation,” Cole says. “Everything else, including part length and width, is exactly the same save for a more oval vent hole on one, as are the operations. This means minimal tool changeover. The robots require no tooling changeover. It’s mostly just calling up a different program in the robot controller and everything else is taken care of.”
Controls Prevent Collisions, Protect Tooling
During cell design, the required presses needed control upgrades.
“We bought used presses for this cell, with outdated controls,” Cole says. “We decided on Cieco for control upgrades because of our familiarity with them and their reliability (as experienced with Cieco controls on other USA Pan presses). And, being right down the road from us helps if we need something right away. For this cell, we needed a control mode to accept an external output from the robots in order to control the press cycles. This is accomplished through the Automatic Single Stroke mode on the Cieco controller (used to allow an external device to initiate a single stroke of the press). We monitor this mode in all of the robot programs. Should the mode be interrupted, say, through a die-protection fault—we have die-protection sensors that interface with the Cieco controller to prevent crashes―or a top stop—the robots won't continue on an automatic cycle.”
Given all of the robotic handling required in this cell, die protection brings added advantages.
“The vents have a bit of oil sheen on them, and may slip and not enter the gap press correctly,” Cole says. “This does not happen often, but if it does, the die-protection system will catch it and prevent damage to the die or the robotic tooling.”
The Cieco controllers send other parameters to the robots, according to Cole, including press-revolution degrees, which signal that the press is fully open to allow a robot to enter.
“Overall,” Cole says, “these controllers make interfacing with robots easy and user-friendly. We went from an all-manual system utilizing four employees to a fully automated robotic-press process. The straightforward and user-friendly Cieco press controls were exactly what we needed to interface the robots with the presses. Part quality has improved due to the dies that we designed inhouse and to the precise loading of the dryer vents by the robots. We also gained production of one more dryer vent per min. with this new process.”
Cell Sequencing a Challenge
While the controls, according to Cole, ease required robot and press communication and monitoring, designing and building a successfully operating press cell is no easy feat. Sequencing the robots, presses and feed line to efficiently produce the vents did prove challenging.
“Ensuring that the robots avoid each other, and controlling the initial forming press to descend via a sensor on the conveyor―all of that proved to be a bit of a hurdle,” Cole says. “So, the biggest learning curve for us was figuring out how to interface everything in what is our biggest press-robot cell.”
The USA Pan team also had to select the right presses to optimize cell production.
“We needed the right press-stroke length because these vents are 3.5 and 4.25 in. deep,” says Cole, “with robot-tooling height of 4 in., and the large sizes of the dies used to produce the vents. So we came across a 200-ton, 20-in.-stroke, double-crank gap-frame mechanical press, with the gap frame needed to allow for robot access.”
Mission accomplished on finding the press, and finding a way to operate and control the new automated cell. MF
View Glossary of Metalforming Terms
OnLogic Joins New Inductive Automation Alliance Partner Prog...
October 10, 2023