Simulation a Saving Grace in Transfer-Die Design
Doerfer supplies turnkey factory automation, tooling and automated-guided-vehicle technologies, and manufactures hydraulic presses, from 500 to 13,000 tons. Doerfer’s Wright Industries’ facility includes one of the largest tool and die facilities in the Southeast United States, according to company officials, building progressive, transfer and hand-operated line dies for customers in the agricultural, lawn products, appliance, automotive and HVAC industries.
Simulation Nets Quick ROI
“Using simulation instead of the conventional build-and-try method saved significant time and money on this transfer-die project,” says Bobby Veach, tool and die manager at Wright Industries. “The customer was impressed with the result, which helped to pave the path for additional work. The software allowed us to lower our quoted price on other projects, beating our competition and winning new orders. We received a return on investment within three months of implementing the software.”
Cutthroat competition and increasing part complexity drove Wright Industries to adopt simulation software.
“Parts have become more complex, delivery times have tightened and we have to be price-competitive on a global basis,” Veach says. “Several years ago, we decided to find a better way to design and build dies. We hired several consulting companies to simulate some of our more difficult dies, and concluded that Pam-Stamp was the best software for the kinds of complex dies that we build. This simulation software is easy to use; it can simulate virtually every type of operation in our business; and its predictions match the real world very closely.”
Pam-Stamp 2G covers the entire tooling process from quotation and die design through formability and tryout validation, including springback prediction and correction. The web-enabled technology allows the sharing of images, annotation, text and 3D models, so users can make decisions online, bringing together design engineers, material providers, die designers and tryout press shops from an early stage of the design right through to production, according to ESI Group officials.
Tackles Challenging Stamping Operation
The previously described part slated for the transfer-die simulation measures 30 by 36 in. with a contoured shape and multiple levels that made production difficult. Wright Industries engineers developed an initial four-station die design. The first operation features critical drawing that forms the basic contours of the part. The second operation trims away excess material, the third restrikes and forms the part to its final shape, and the fourth operation pierces and cam pierces. The combination of a deep draw and a tight material allowance makes it difficult to absorb the stretch during the drawing operation without exceptional thinning.
“The traditional approach for
|Wright Industries designed and built a transfer die to produce this complex part. By using computer simulation of part forming, engineers optimized the die design without a costly and time-consuming trial-and-error process.
Addresses Thinning and Trim-Line Placement
On this project, engineers exported the tool geometry of the initial die configuration from Pro/Engineer computer-aided-design software into the IGES file format and then imported the geometry into Pam-Stamp. The initial simulation iteration discovered areas where the die would stretch the part beyond the capabilities of the material and cause tearing. Simulation pinpointed part-thinning areas of the part in the die, mostly centered around small radii in the initial part design. The engineers performed additional simulations —changing drawing depth, pressure on the binder and other variables—but were unable to correct the thinning problem. They then tried increasing the size of these radii and reran the simulation, improving the situation but not completely eliminating the problem. Repeatedly tweaking the part design and rerunning the simulation ultimately produced the ideal part.
Because Doerfer and Wright Industries cannot change the part design without customer permission, engineers met with the customer and showed the simulation results indicating that the tearing problems could be resolved by increasing the radii. The customer approved the changes to the part and the engineers got back to the task of designing the rest of the die.
The next step was to determine a developed trim line for the second operation. The goal: Leave sufficient material to make the trim feasible, but as small of an amount as possible to reduce material costs. Since the third operation actually formed the part to its final shape, it was necessary to jump ahead to this operation to determine how the part should be trimmed in the second operation. Engineers used the Pam-Stamp inverse-solution feature that estimates blank size based on finished-part size.
“The inverse-solution feature does not provide 100 percent accuracy, but it is much more accurate than the traditional method,” Veach says.
The engineers then went back to the second operation, setting up the die to trim to the line determined by inverse simulation of the third operation. No simulation was required for piercing in the fourth operation.
No More Guesswork
“For this application,” says Veach, “we determined the process, developed the initial blank, controlled the flow of material during the first draw form and monitored thinning percentages before we even started building the die. The result was that the die worked perfectly the first time we hit it. There’s no way to know for sure exactly how much money and time we saved by not having to recut and retest the die—it all depends on how quickly we would have been able to find a solution using the cut-and-hope method. But I am confident that we have captured projects because the savings through simulation has made us more competitive. We have seen savings of the same magnitude on many other complex parts that presented similar challenges.”
This application demonstrates how computer simulation has helped Wright Industries offer competitive prices and quicken delivery time.
“Instead of building and testing the die to see if it works, we simulate a number of different potential designs and pick the one that best meets our customer’s requirements,” concludes Veach. “We frequently can improve the efficiency of the forming operation by reducing the number of stations and determining die size. We also can reduce material costs by simulating the stamping operation with several different types of materials. In many cases, a lesser grade of material than the one originally selected by the customer will work. Optimizing the size of the blank also can reduce material consumption.” MF
Related Enterprise Zones: Tool & Die
There are no comments posted at this time.