The Team Approach to Sensors
The above-mentioned technical experts each has a point of view on a given die, but it is limited to their respective fields of expertise. That is why the company’s sensor applications specialist must include all four experts in the sensor applications process. This should take place at the early stages where the determination is made as to what areas of a die must be sensed. For example, on an existing die where the only sensor is a primitive coat-hanger wire at the end of the die for short-feed detection, the desire is to have the die fully sensed for all of the major causes of production stoppages, ranging from mechanical nuisance jams and stops to full-blown die crashes.
Let’s look at the feed issues. We are going to assume that primitive as it is, the coat-hanger wire, when properly set up, may give us some semblance of short-feed detection. The setter sets the die and then hands it over to the operator. From that point onward, the operator is the closest we have to a real-time set of instrumentation as to the hour-by-hour, day-by-day and month-to-month running status of the die. The operator may live side-by-side with the die eight or more hours a day. The operator consequently is full of excellent insights and information on the performance of the die during its production runs.
The setter and even the toolmaker may know that occasionally the press will be stopped by the short-feed probe, but the operator knows that the material buckles because one of the cams occasionally sticks and returns in an erratic manner. The die does not crash for the cam does return, albeit late, but it does cause a short feed on those occasions. The setter and the toolmaker call it a short-feed issue and may blame the feed mechanism, but the operator knows better. The real culprit is the uncooperative cam.
Take the above example and apply it to a meeting where the toolmaker, setter, operator and maintenance technician will determine which areas of the die will undergo electronic sensoring. At the meeting everyone agrees that a feed-sensing mechanism is needed that, with the aid of electronic sensors, will detect a short or a long feed and thus the press will be stopped before it closes on top of the misfeed. The operator speaks up and suggests that the occasionally jamming cam should be monitored as well. Everyone else at the meeting is pleasantly surprised to know about this cam as sensor monitoring not only will give a specific point of failure alert at the die-protection controls, but more stopping time will be available as the offending cam’s failure to return would occur before the feed cycle is even initiated.
The maintenance expert attending the meeting speaks up and describes the issue of ram parallelism and how his department wishes that there was a way to monitor for foreign objects in the die, so that the ram and press linkages would not be threatened with the resultant misalignment. The rest of the group hears this request and decides, on the spot, to monitor the stripper plates to make sure that they do not close on top of items that should not be laying on the strip.
Now imagine such cooperation on a regularly scheduled basis where the individual experiences and perspectives of toolmakers, setters, operators and maintenance personnel are clearly heard and continually probed. Shops that hold such open and frank technical meetings permit their sensor applications specialists to hear and learn from diverse and equally valid points of view. Very little if anything is overlooked. The die will go from 1950s-vintage coat-hanger die-protection technology to 15 or more electronic sensors monitoring feed, stripper plates, cam returns and parts out. The die, thus fully sensored, should for all practical purposes run unattended and at maximum safe mechanical speeds for the rest of its natural lifespan. MF
There are no comments posted at this time.