Articles


 

SHARE:  

Finishing Abrasives: Use the Right Tool for the Job

By: Brad Kuvin

Wednesday, June 01, 2011
 

Metalformers performing general fabrication and arc welding compile a long laundry list of tasks around the shop requiring grinding and finishing, including removal and blending of die marks, light to heavy stock removal in the toolroom, weld blending and polishing and fine-tuning of die surfaces. To select the right abrasive product for the job, the accompanying Abrasive Selection Guide covers a lot of ground; to hit the highlights, MetalForming spoke with an expert in the use of coated abrasive products—Dave Long, director of marketing, strategy and marketing information for Norton Abrasives.

Manufacturers of grinding and finishing products offer abrasives of varying types and grit sizes in four different types of substrate, selected for the task at hand: grinding wheel, flap disc, fiber disc and nonwoven products. At one end of the finishing spectrum, grinding wheels offer heavy stock removal; at the other end, nonwoven products allow fabricators to polish and finish, remove oxidation and corrosion—surface preparation without disturbing the material surface.

Not all abrasives perform the same, and Long explains why.

“Ceramic abrasives developed in the late 1990s offer fabricators tremendous performance advantages compared to previous abrasive products—aluminum oxide, for example,” says Long. “While ceramic alumina grain have a higher purchase price, fabricators need to recognize the return on investment they offer. With ceramic abrasives, they can expect three to four times the performance level compared to aluminum oxide, and as much as ten-fold improvement in product life.”

The performance improvement comes from the way the abrasive grains perform in service. Grind with a wheel loaded with aluminum oxide and you’ll note large chunks of each grain fracturing away, while ceramic-alumina abrasive is designed to microfracture. As the grains fracture, tiny pieces are expelled to provide a continuous supply of sharp cutting edges. This translates into faster cutting and longer wheel life.

“Grain utilization is the key performance indicator,” says Long. “With aluminum oxide, grain utilization is only 20 to 25 percent. That jumps to 85 to 90 percent for ceramic alumina. While this performance gain pays off when grinding and finishing mild and carbon steels, fabricators will really notice the gain in productivity—fewer wheel changes and reduced labor costs—when working on hard materials such as stainless steels.”

For shops working with softer materials such as aluminum alloys, abrasive-product manufacturers have you covered as well. The key here is to use a finishing product that resists loading, or won’t become “gummed up” with the workpiece material.

“What we’re recommending for aluminum grinding and finishing,” says Long, “are products preloaded with a wax-impregnated coating ( Norton Abrasives brought such a product to market late in 2010). The coating fills the gaps between the abrasive grains so that the workpiece material can’t. Shops working with aluminum would be wise to use fiber discs rather than grinding wheels, with this wax-impregnated coating.”

Once you’ve selected the right abrasive for the job, what about the product—wheel or disc? Here, Long recommends first and foremost that fabricators use the right tool for the job. Cutoff wheels, he says, are designed for use on their periphery, reinforced with vertical strength for edge pressure. Don’t try to grind with one. Likewise, grinding wheels, with few exceptions, are reinforced to handle face pressure—don’t try to perform cutoff operations with them. Long does note that manufacturers do offer combination wheels that can cut and grind, but there’s a tradeoff in performance. “The best cutoff wheels on the market today,” he says, “are ultra-thin, 0.040 in., and can’t be used on their face. Kerf is minimal and speed optimum—they’re ideal for cutoff. A combination wheel is thicker, 1⁄8 in. or so. It can grind, but for cutoff the kerf is wider and cutting speed is slower than when using a cutoff wheel. Most users select the ultra-thin wheels for cutoff and a ¼-in.-thick wheel for grinding and finishing.”

Grinding wheels offer the most aggressive action, for pure metal removal. Select a flap disc for aggressive metal removal and for applications where the ability to grind and finish at the same time is beneficial. “With flap discs,” says Long, “the operator can be steep on the edge of the wheel and remove metal much more quickly than with a grinding wheel. He can then reduce the angle of attack and make nice, wide swaths to impart a smooth surface.”

Also, flap discs, due to their buildup of overlapping abrasive-impregnated flaps, provide a cushioning effect in use. “They’re not as hard-acting as a grinding wheel,” adds Long, “avoiding vibration and optimizing operator comfort.” MF

 

See also: Norton Abrasives

Related Enterprise Zones: Other Processes, Welding


Reader Comments

Posted by: EndumessetGum on 11/21/2013 10:21:00 PM - URL: http://kutu.askcarlyle.com/
zfyjqb.com | スノーボード ツアー | ウェア スノボ | エルボーパッド | スノボ ゴーグル | スノーボード ビンディング | jnjtlz | 激安スキーウェア | スキー靴 激安 | スキー 初心者 | スキー用具 |

 

Post a Comment

* Indicates field is required.

YOUR COMMENTS * (You may use html to format)

YOUR NAME *
EMAIL *
WEBSITE

 

 

Visit Our Sponsors